AIHCE Tuesday
Technical Program Sessions
Look for updated session and speaker information
in your AIHCE Final Program which will be distributed on-site. Listings
may change from the AIHCE Advance Program.
General SessionTuesday, June 8, 1999
8:00 a.m.9:30 a.m.
North American Panel
Prominent O&EHS professionals from Mexico, the United States, and Canada
will discuss the challenges
facing North America in the future.
- United States: Charles N. Jeffress, Assistant Secretary
for Labor, OSHA
- Canada: Warren R. Edmondson, Assistant Deputy Minister,
Labour Branch
- Mexico: Dr. Juan Legaspi Velasco, Director General, Direccion
General de Seguridad e Hygiene en el Trabajo
Roundtable: 211
Occupational Health Professionals in Canada: Working Together Toward
a Common Goal Challenges and Learnings in a Global Environment
10:00 a.m.12:30 p.m.
Arranger: J. Froats, Aultsville Management Consultants, Vancouver,
BC; Moderator: J. Froats, Aultsville Management Consultants, Vancouver,
BC; A. Johnston, Agra Earth & Environment Coquitlam Prov., BC
The purpose of this roundtable is to describe the various occupational
health professional associations operating in Canada and explore their existing
and future interrelationships. The roundtable will provide an opportunity
for communication and collaboration among Canadian occupational health professionals:
occupational hygienists, physicians, nurses, ergonomists, and safety professionals.
The Toronto AIHCE marks an opportunity to serve as a catalyst to recognize
the changes that are taking place in the interrelationships among all professionals
interested in reducing workplace-related morbidity and mortality. Representatives
from the key stakeholder groups will discuss their respective organizations
and identify how they can interact in a more effective way in the future.
The key organizations to be included are: Canadian Registration Board of
Occupational Hygienists (CRBOH), Occupational & Environmental Medical
Association of Canada (OEMAC), Human Factors Association of Canada (HFAC),
Canadian Occupational Health Nurses Association (COHNA), Canadian Association
of Registered Safety Professionals (ACRSP), and the Canadian Environmental
Certification Approval Board (CECAB). Audience participation will be encouraged
through the use of sufficient time to promote dialogue and discussion with
the panel speakers.
- L. Cheung, OEMAC, Hamilton, ONFuture Directions of OEMAD
- K. Godden, COHNA, Brantford, ONProgressing Through Partnerships:
Occupational Health Nursing in CanadaWhats Next
- G. Wright, Human Factors Association of Canada, Toronto, ONHuman
Factors in Canada, Crossroads for the Profession
- M. Dupuis, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI
- U. Bickis, Phoenix OHC, Inc., Kingston, OntarioCRBOH: More than
Certification, Directions for the New Millennium
- M. Ceschi-Smith, Canadian Environmental Certification Approvals, Calgary,
ABCanadian Certified Environmental Practitioners (CCEP): What is
Next?
Roundtable: 212
Determining Breakthrough Times for Organic Vapor Cartridges
10:00 a.m.12:30 p.m.
Arranger: A. Brockhaus, Organization Resources Counselors, Inc.,
Washington, DC; Moderator: D. Mattheis, Organization Resources Counselors,
Inc., Washington, DC; Monitor: A. Brockhaus, Organization Resources
Counselors, Inc., Washington, DC
OSHAs final Respirator Standard, published in the Federal Register
on January 8, 1998 (63 F.R. 1152), requires that employers who use respirators
for atmospheres containing gases or vapors that are potentially toxic but
not IDLH, supply a respirator that is appropriate for the chemical(s) it
is used against. OSHA allows the use of either an atmosphere-supplying respirator
or an air-purifying respirator. OSHA requires that an air purifying respirator
either have an End of Service Life Indicator or the employer must implement
an appropriate change schedule for cartridge/canisters based on objective
information or data that will assure that breakthrough does not occur while
the respirator is in use. Since these regulations have been issued, OSHA
and industry have been working to come up with practical and effective ways
to make breakthrough determinations. The speakers on this forum will discuss,
evaluate and explain what has been done to meet this requirement by both
industry and OSHA, and what new efforts are being made to assist users of
organic vapor cartridge/canister respirators.
- A. Finkel, OSHA, Washington, DCThe Use of Modeling Equations
to Determine an Effective End-of-Service Life for Organic Vapor Cartridges
- K. Barrett, The American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DCAn
Industry Partnership to Develop Breakthrough Data on Organic Vapor Cartridges
- R. Fairfax, OSHA, Boston, MAOSHA Enforcement Policy on Use of
Organic Vapor Cartridges
- C. Freeman, OSHA, Washington, DCCooperative Federal Research
Efforts on Determination of Organic Vapor Respirator Cartridge Breakthrough
Times
Roundtable: 213
Implementation of the Size-Selective Criteria for Aerosol Sampling
10:00 a.m.12:30 p.m.
Arranger: M. Dupuis, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI; Moderator:
J. Vincent, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor,
MI; Monitor: M. Clark, Battelle, Richland, WA
The purpose of this roundtable is to provide a discussion of issues surrounding
the implementation of the particle-size selective sampling criteria for
airborne particulate matter as described by the ACGIH-TLV® and the 1997
ISO/CEN. This standard is one of the first globally adopted standards for
the exposure assessment of a workplace hazard. The new criteria have been
established based upon a model guided by physiology and aerosol physics
and have been a driving force for the development of new sampling devices.
Implementation of the criteria in the workplace have raised questions such
as: What instruments are available that meet the new criteria and how do
they compare with others that claim conformance to the new standards? How
well do we understand and interpret the differences in results of samples
collected by the different criteria? How do we explain these differences
to workers? The objective of the roundtable is to provide the practicing
industrial hygienist with information on size-selective sampling of aerosols
that can be readily put into practice.
- B. Cohen, Nelson Institute of Environmental Medicine, Tuxedo, NYSummation
- B. Stuart, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Lafayette, NJThoracic
Aerosol Sampling
- D. Bartley, NIOSH-DPSE, Cincinnati, OHRespirable Aerosol Sampling
- D. Zalk, University of California, Hazards Control Department, Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CAInhalable Aerosol Sampling
- L. Brosseau, University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Minneapolis,
MNOverview of Size-Selective Criteria for Aerosol Sampling
Roundtable: 214
Federal Lead Action Programs
10:00 a.m.Noon
Arranger: W. Friedman, HUD, Washington, DC; Moderator: W.
Friedman, HUD, Washington, DC; Monitor: D. Levitt, HUD, Washington,
DC
The U.S. federal government is implementing a variety of programs addressing
lead hazard identification and reduction. This roundtable will review and
discuss the status and direction of lead action programs at the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development, EPA, OSHA, NIOSH, and the Consumer Product
Safety Commission. Staff from each of these agencies will present the major
current and upcoming elements of their programs and answer questions from
the audience. As appropriate, questions will be directed to one or more
agencies staff. The objectives of the roundtable are to provide the
part of the industrial hygiene community addressing lead issues with insight
into the status and direction of federal agencies with major programs, and
to allow these industrial hygienists the opportunity to have their questions
answered in a widely publicized forum.
- W. Friedman, HUD, Washington, DCLead Regulatory and Research
Program
- D. Jacobs, HUD, Washington, DCHUD Lead Program Management
- A. Sussell, NIOSH/DSHEFS R-11, Cincinnati, OHNIOSH Lead Program
Update
- B. Cook, EPA/OPPT/Technical Branch, Washington, DCEPA Lead Program
Update
Roundtable: 215
Joint ABIH/BCSP Committee for the Certification of Occupational Health
and Safety Technologists Forum
10:00 a.m.Noon
Arranger: E. Bartosh, Health Risk Associates, Dixon, CA; Moderator:
E. Bartosh, Health Risk Associates, Dixon, CA; Monitor: E. Taylor,
Health Risk Associates, Dixon, CA
This first-time forum will present the strategic plan and activities
of the Joint ABIH/BCSP Committee for the Certification of Occupational Health
and Safety Technologies. The joint committee is responsible for the certification
program for industrial hygiene technologists, safety technicians, and construction
supervisors. This certification process tests the skills of technicians
in the areas of the basic sentences, laws and regulations, control and investigation
concepts, survey techniques, data computation, and recordkeeping, education,
training, and instruction. The overall purpose of this forum is to provide
information to industrial hygienists and industrial hygiene technicians
on this changing program and to secure their feedback on new eligibility
requirements, committee products, and direction of the joint committee.
This forum will also provide an open discussion of the needs for such a
certification, promotion of the certification and its ideals, and the newly
instituted certification maintenance procedures.
- E. Bartosh, Health Risk Associates, Dixon, CAJoint Committee
Strategic Plan
- K. Smith, Joint ABIH/BCSP Committee, Dixon, CATechnologist Certification
and other Joint Committee Activities
Roundtable: 216
Strange and Unusual Environmental and Industrial Health Investigations
10:00 a.m.Noon
Arranger: P. Breysse, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Moderator:
P. Breysse, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Monitor: L. Monteith,
University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Presenters with more than 100 years of experience will present a number
of strange and unusual investigations in which they have been involved.
Examples include: (1) Two men died in a manhole. Why did they enter? Source
of demise? (2) Gymnasium building completed. Soil excavation adjacent to
building. Flash fire. Source? How serious? (3) Premature incubators. Children
infections? Water reservoir disinfected. Source of infection? There will
be at least one half hour for audience participation.
Roundtable: 217
Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) in the Industrial
Hygiene Laboratory
10:00 a.m.Noon
Arranger: F. Posey, Assay Technologies, Youngstown, OH; Moderator:
F. Posey, Assay Technologies, Youngstown, OH; Monitor: G. Sutton,
Galson Laboratories, East Syracuse, NY
Problems and considerations involved in the implementation of LIMS systems
in a variety of industrial hygiene laboratories will be presented. Emphasis
will be placed on the adaptation of off-the-shelf software as well as a
custom design based on an Oracle database. Topics discussed will include
training, software selection, planning, design, report generation, raw data
reduction, and even customer Internet access. Differences between expectations
and real world experiences will be explored keeping in mind that its
not as easy as you would think.
- R. Pristas, Exxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc., East Millstone, NJImplementing
a LIMS SystemIts Not as Easy as You Think
- B. Rutherford, Rumken, Inc., Cuyahoga Falls, OHLIMS Development
in the Information Age
- K. Taylor, Assay Technologies, Youngstown, OHDevelopment of Custom
(Oracle) LIMS System for a Reference Laboratory
- J. Hendershott, Ashland Chemical Company, Dublin, OHImplementing
an Off-the-Shelf (WinLIMS) LIMS System
Platform Session 112
Gas and Vapor Detection
10:00 a.m.Noon, Papers 9499
Arranger: C. Joseph, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC; Moderators:
D. Patrick, NorLab Calibration Gases, Ashley, MI; M. Harper, SKC, Inc.,
Houston, TX; Monitor: J. Chenoweth, Raytheon, Indianapolis, IN
- 10:00 a.m. FIBERGLASS WORKER MONITORING WITH OPEN PATH FOURIER
TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY. (94) R. Crampton, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA
- 10:20 a.m. PERSONAL MONITORING INSTRUMENT FOR THE SELECTIVE
SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT OF MULTIPLE ORGANIC VAPORS. (95) J. Park, University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- 10:40 a.m. DATA-LOGGING ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS IDENTIFY PEAK
AND 15 MINUTE TIME-WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXPOSURES TO CHLORINE DIOXIDE IN THE
PULP INDUSTRY. (96) L. Svirchev, Workers Compensation Board of British
Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; G. Astrakianakis, British Columbia
Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; R. Janssen, Workers Compensation
Board of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; P. Band, N. Le,
C. Tang, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; J.
Bert, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
- 11:00 a.m. LIMITATIONS OF WEIGHT CHANGE TECHNIQUE FOR EVALUATION
OF PASSIVE DOSIMETERS. (97) L. Monteith, University of Washington, Seattle,
WA
- 11:20 a.m. VALIDATION OF A PASSIVE SAMPLER FOR KETONES. (98)
S. Tsai, S. Que Hee, UCLA, School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
- 11:40 a.m. FIELD INVESTIGATION COMPARING DIFFUSION BADGE AND
CHARCOAL TUBE MONITORING FOR STYRENE. (99) R. Dobos, J&H Marsh &
McLennan, Atlanta, GA
Platform Session 113
Noise: Measurement, Protection, and New Proposals
9:45 a.m.12:15 p.m., Papers 100106
Arranger: D. Romo, EBI Companies, Dallas, TX; Moderator: L.
Hager, James Anderson & Associates, Okemos, MI; Monitor: D. Romo,
EBI Companies, Dallas, TX
- 9:45 a.m. SOUND PRESSURE LEVELS OF SELECTED CONSTRUCTION TASKS.
(100) C. Johnson, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; M. Kerr, University
of Minnesota, School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN; L. Brosseau, University
of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN
- 10:05 a.m. A COMPARISON OF EXPOSURE METRICS FOR OCCUPATIONAL
NOISE EXPOSURES IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. (101) R. Neitzel, J. Camp,
N. Seixas, J. Yost, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- 10:25 a.m. AUDITORY PERCEPTION DEFICITS WITH HEARING PROTECTIVE
DEVICES. (102) S. Abel, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
- 10:45 a.m. EVALUATION OF PERSONAL HEARING PROTECTION DEVICES
IN REAL USE CONDITIONS AND POOR SCHOLARITY WORKERS TRAINING. (103)
A. Rodrigues Miguel, R. Araujo, M. Lacomblez, R. Vasconcelos, Universidade
Do Minho, Guimaraes
- 11:05 a.m. INSERT-TYPE HEARING PROTECTOR ATTENUATION MEASUREMENT
ON END-USERS IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY. (104) K. Michael, Michael & Associates,
Inc., State College, PA
- 11:25 a.m. APPLICATION OF ACGIH ULTRASONIC TLVs FOR HEARING
DEVICES. (105) M. Lenhardt, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond,
VA
- 11:45 a.m. TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS
AND DESIGN CRITERIA FOR USE IN THE PRESENCE OF HIGH BACKGROUND NOISE. (106)
D. Driscoll, Associates in Acoustics, Inc., Evergreen, CO
Platform Session 114
International Occupational Hygiene Issues
10:00 a.m.Noon, Papers 107112
Arrangers: A. Golembienski, Proctor and Gamble Company, Cincinnati,
OH; G. Peters, Proctor and Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH; Moderators:
B. Concoby, Genencor International, Palo Alto, CA; G. Peters, Proctor and
Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH; Monitors: G. Hogue, Genencor International,
Palo Alto, CA; M. Hacomber, Proctor and Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH
- 10:00 a.m. INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE IN MALAYSIA: PRESENT AND FUTURE.
(107) J. Singh, Liberty Risk Services, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- 10:20 a.m. AN OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE INVESTIGATION OF A NOODLE-MAKING
FACTORY IN TERENGGANU, MALAYSIA. (108) C. Achutan, The University of Iowa,
Iowa City, IA; F. Jantan, Kelinik Kesihatan Paka, Terengganu, Malaysia
- 10:40 a.m. INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE INTERNATIONAL IMPACT ON ENGINEERING,
ISO-9000, AND ISO-14000. (109) R. Maxson, Ray Maxson Engineering, Charlotte,
NC
- 11:00 a.m. OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE IN POLAND. (110) E. Wiecek,
J. Gromiec, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland
- 11:20 a.m. OCCUPATONAL HYGIENE IN VIETNAMESE IRON FOUNDRIES.
(111) D. Groce, N. Bao, N. Thuc, NIOSH, Morgantown, WV
- 11:40 a.m. ANALYSIS OF 24 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS IN USE OR UNDER DEVELOPMENT THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. (112) C. Redinger,
Redinger & Associates, San Francisco, CA; H. Dalrymple, ICL Beaumont
Old Windsor, Berks, England
Platform Session 115
Ergonomic Evaluations and Interventions in a Variety of Industries
9:45 a.m.12:30 p.m., Papers 113120
Arranger: G. Malone, General Motors-Powertrain HQ, Pontiac, MI; Moderators:
B. Joseph, Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, MI; G. Malone, General Motors-Powertrain
HQ, Pontiac, MI; Monitors: L. Orta-Anes, International United Auto
Workers, Detroit, MI; S. Gibson, Simpsonville, SC
- 9:45 a.m. UPPER EXTREMITIES MUSCULOSKELETAL DISCOMFORT IN AN
AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE ENGINEERING FIRM. (113) W. Liu, C. Conlon, UCLA,
Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Los Angeles, CA
- 10:05 a.m. ANTHOLOGY OF SHIPYARD ERGONOMIC SOLUTIONS. (114)
S. Hudock, NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH; J. McGlothlin, Purdue University, W.
Lafayette, IN; L. Reed, T. Hales, S. Wurzelbacher, NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH;
K. Siegfried, Maine Employers Mutual Insurance Company, Portland,
MA
- 10:25 a.m. USING ERGONOMIC INTERVENTIONS AS A METRIC TO COMPARE
JAPANESE AND AMERICAN SHIPBUILDING AND REPAIR INDUSTRIES. (115) J. McGlothlin,
Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN; L. Reed, S. Hudock, T. Hales, NIOSH,
Cincinnati, OH
- 10:45 a.m. OVEREXERTION INJURIES AND ERGONOMICS IN AUTOMOTIVE
SERVICE PARTS DISTRIBUTION CENTERS. (116) W. Keyserling, S. Ulin, The University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; A. Lincoln, S. Baker, Johns Hopkins School
of Hygiene and Public Health Baltimore, MD
- 11:05 a.m. MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURIES IN ONTARIO NURSING HOMES.
(117) P. Scherzinger, Ontario Ministry of Labour, Sudbury, Ontario; P.
White, Seamless Productions, Toronto, Ontario; C. Armstrong, Ontario Ministry
of Labour, Hamilton, Ontario; K. Bender, Ontario Ministry of Labour, Toronto,
Ontario; J. Frauts, Ontario Ministry of Labour, Mississauga, Ontario
- 11:25 a.m. ERGONOMIC APPROACH TOWARD LAYOUT REDESIGN FOR SEMICONDUCTOR
WORKERS. (118) C. Lu, Kaosiung Medical College, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- 11:45 a.m. A GRASSROOTS ERGONOMICS APPROACH TO WASTE CONTAINER
HANDLING. (119) D. Zalk, University of California, Hazards Control Department,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA; T. Biggs,
C. Perry, Environmental Protection Department, Hazardous Waste Management
Division, LLNL, Livermore, CA; P. Tittiranonda, Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, Livermore, CA; S. Burastero, R. Das, Health Services Department,
LLNL, Livermore, CA; M. Maldonado, R. Tageson, L. Barsnick, Environmental
Protection Department, Hazardous Waste Management Division, LLNL, Livermore,
CA
- 12:05 p.m. ERGONOMIC EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT OF LOBSTERMEN. (120)
S. Fulmer, B. Buchholz, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Lowell, MA
Roundtable: 218
Current Gaps in Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Health Practices,
Standards, and Guidelines: The AIHA Approach
1:00 p.m.4:00 p.m.
Arranger: A Fleeger, Exxon Company, Houston, TX; Moderator:
L. Booher, Exxon Research & Engineering, Fhlosem Park, NJ; Monitor:
Z. Walton, Portland, OR
There is an increasing interest in licensing and codifying the practice
of industrial hygiene. If we are to control this process our profession
must develop a set of standards of practice with which we can guide our
practice and guide those who would regulate us. In June 1997, AIHAs
Guidelines of Good Practice Task Force reported shortcomings in available
standards and guidelines for the profession. Based upon this finding, the
AIHA established the Practices, Standards, and Guidelines Committee, which
is committed to the development of guidelines that are useful to its members,
where such documents are lacking or inadequate.
- A. Fleeger, Exxon Company, USA, Baytown, TXExisting Gaps in Available
Practices, Standards and Guidelines
- D. Burton, IVE Inc., Bountiful, UTAIHAs Role in Developing
Practices, Standards and Guidelines
- M. Harris, Hamlin & Harris, Inc., Baton Rouge, LACompendium
of Applied Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Health Practices
- M. Gomez, AIHA, Fairfax, VADeveloping ANSI Standards: AIHAs
Role
- W. Friedman, HUD, Washington, DCPS&G Committee Update. Where
Do We Go From Here?
Roundtable: 219
Ergonomics and Physical or Occupational Therapy
1:00 p.m.4:00 p.m.
Arranger: R. Marklin, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI; Moderator:
C. Stuart-Buttle, Philadelphia, PA; Monitor: E. Kraft, EMK Associates,
Maple Glen, PA
The objective of this roundtable is to stimulate a discussion of the
relationship between ergonomics and therapy professions (physical or occupational)
in the workplace. Based on their own experiences and training, speakers
will address the following questions:
1. How do ergonomics and physical or occupational therapy relate? Are they
complementary?
2. Should ergonomics and physical or occupational therapy be implemented
jointly in a workplace?
3. If the answer to no. 2 is yes, then how should you set up ergonomics
and therapy programs?
4. Are there case studies of successful programs?
The diversity of the speakers experiences and backgrounds will provide
the backdrop for a lively discussion of the pros and cons of integrating
ergonomics and physical or occupational therapy.
- S. Sandefur, Saginaw Metal Castings Operations, Saginaw, MIErgonomics
Involvement in New Hire Orientation and Injury Prevention
- C. Novack, Saginaw Metal Castings Operations, Saginaw, MIErgonomics
Involvement in New Hire Orientation and Injury Prevention
- M. Dupuis, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MIErgonomics Involvement
in New Hire Orientation and Injury Prevention
- V. Rice, U.S. Amy Medical Center and School, Ft. Sam Houston, TXErgonomics
and Rehabilitation
- D. Kuran, Saginaw Metal Castings Operations, Saginaw, MIErgonomics
Involvement in New Hire Orientation and Injury Prevention
- S. Falkenburg, Aon Ergonomic Services, Milwaukee, WIErgonomics:
Fit or Misfit for Therapists
- A. Heller, INSITE PT, Pacific Grove, CAThe Integration of Ergonomics
and Physical Therapy
Roundtable: 220
Canadian Issues Roundtable
1:00 p.m.4:00 p.m.
Arranger: D. Nikkel, Manitoba Labour, Workplace Safety & Health
Branch, Winnipeg, Manitoba; Moderator: D. Nikkel, Manitoba Labour,
Workplace Safety & Health Branch, Winnipeg, Manitoba; Monitor:
J. Introito, Manitoba Dept. of Labor, Winnipeg, Manitoba
The occupational hygiene profession in Canada faces unique challenges.
Laboring in the shadow of the U.S., largely spread out along a narrow (but
long) ribbon of land dotted with foreign-owned corporations, dichotomized
by language, divided among 13 nonoverlapping jurisdictions, yet still bound
by common nationality, values and legislative base Canadian occupational
hygienists need to improve on how they work together.
This years CRBOH Board has articulated a new vision and mission for
the organization, including:
- Develop a format/integrating relationship with and among the six regional
hygiene associations in Canada.
- Facilitate their communication and cooperation (on matters that are
encompassed within CRBOHs mandate) within Canada and in international
(global) matters.
This roundtable is intended to provide those who have an interest in
or who actually practice hygiene in Canada (and also having a rare opportunity
to attend AIHCE on native soil) a forum in which to develop a better understanding
of the issues (and their solutions) that are topical in other Canadian jurisdictions,
to enable them to work collectively toward developing better means of communication,
cooperation, and collaboration.
- O. Peter, General Motors, Oshawa, ONConsultation Group Process
Government and Professional Organizations
- R. Lockhart, BC Research Inc., Vancouver, British ColumbiaThe
Growth and Health of Occupational Hygiene in Western Canada
- J. Van Delden, City of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MBThe Need for a Canadian
OH Communication System
- N. Dhanani, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, ABTitle Protection:
A Rough Road
- C. Millet, Occupational Hygiene Health & Safety Association of
Quebec, Ville dAnjou, QuebecWhy OH Should Not Be an Exclusive
Field of Practice for Engineers
- D. Wurster, Michelin North America, New Glasgow, NSHow ISO 14001
Can Help You Comply With the Nova Scotia OH&S Act
Roundtable: 221
International Occupational Health and Safety Issues in Small Enterprises:
Global Problems, Local Solutions
1:00 p.m.4:00 p.m.
Arranger: K. Diep, KLD, Inc., Toronto, Ontario; Moderator:
K. Diep, KLD, Inc., Toronto, Ontario; Monitor: J. Guernsey, Dalhousie
University and the IWK/Grace Health Centre for Women, Halifax, Nova Scotia
Health and safety management in small enterprise makes sound business
sense. More and more small businesses have participated in the global market
and trade extensively abroad. The growth of small enterprises in the global
market accompanies an increased concern about their workplace health and
safety issues, similar to those of big corporations. There are pros and
cons in health and safety management in small enterprises; there also are
solutions for the problems that they are facing. Together, owners and workers
of the small enterprises can find solutions that meet their needs.
- H. Ulloa, Avenida El Dorado, Santa Fe De BogotaOccupational Health
Programs With Little Resources
- D. Ublanski, Toronto Workers Health and Safety Legal Clinic,
Toronto, ON, CanadaIs There Any Hope for Improved Health and Safety
Management in Small Businesses?
- J. Eakin, University of Toronto, TorontoApproaches to the Promotion
of Health and Safety in Small Workplaces: International Comparisons and
Key Questions
- D. Robertson, Toronto, OntarioOccupational Health and Safety
Successes in Small Companies
- P. Challen, Canadian Occupational Safety Magazine, Burlington, OntarioInternational
Health and Safety Issues in Small Enterprises: Getting the Message Across
Roundtable: 222
Barriers to Implementing Biological Monitoring in the Workplace
1:00 p.m.4:00 p.m.
Arranger: K. Cummins, U.S. Dept. of Labor, OSHA Health Response Team,
Salt Lake City, UT; Moderator: K. Cummins, U.S. Dept. of Labor, OSHA
Health Response Team, Salt Lake City, UT; Monitor: S. Que Hee, UCLA,
Los Angeles, CA
Despite the successes made in the U.S. in controlling air exposure to
harmful agents, only limited progress has been made in preventing exposure
to workers via skin or ingestion of hazardous chemicals. In order to achieve
a breakthrough in the area of disease prevention, better assessment of worker
exposure to chemicals is needed. Biological monitoring is the principal
means used for determining exposure to chemicals in the workplace, however,
it is used only on an infrequent basis in the U.S. Internationally, biological
monitoring has been more widely accepted as a tool for measuring worker
exposure. The purpose of this discussion will be to address the principal
factors that have limited the widespread use of biological monitoring in
the United States as a tool for monitoring worker exposure to chemicals
or physical agents. Outcomes of this discussion may include recommendations
on whether current practices should be changed, and measures that can be
adopted to accomplish this change.
- J. Henshaw, Solutia, Inc., St. Louis, MOBiological Monitoring:
A Corporate Perspective
- A. Finkel, OSHA, Washington, DCBiological Monitoring and Regulatory
Issues
- P. Edelman, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington,
DCBiological Monitoring: Defining the Scope and Nature of the Problem
- L. Lowry, The University of Texas Health Center at Tyler, Tyler, TXInternational
Biological Monitoring Practices
Roundtable: 223
The Global Marketing of Asbestos
1:00 p.m.4:00 p.m.
Arranger: P. Greenley, MIT, Cambridge, MA; Moderator: P. Greenley,
MIT, Cambridge, MA; Monitor: E. Gross, Dana Farber, Boston, MA
The hazards of asbestos have been well known for more than 25 years.
Use in the United States has declined precipitously for the past 20 years
until very little new asbestos is currently used. Yet there is still a global
marketing campaign going on today to sell and promote the use of asbestos
products worldwide, but primarily in the third world. The main force behind
this marketing campaign has been the asbestos industry in Canada and the
Canadian government. This roundtable will take a close look at the global
campaign and some of its strategies. While nonchrysotile forms of asbestos
have been almost universally banned, chrysotile continues to be used and
the proponents claim it can be used safely. They have vigorously opposed
bans in Europe, although with little success. More and more countries have
banned all forms of asbestos. We will take a critical look at the claims
for the safety of chrysotile, look at the fight for and against a ban in
England, look at the ban asbestos movement in Brazil (Brazil being the third
largest producer of asbestos in the world). Finally, we will hear from a
representative of the asbestos industry in Canada to hear about their efforts
to make asbestos product use more acceptable.
- F. GiannasiThe Asbestos Ban Movement in Brazil
- A. Dalton, Transport and General Workers Union, Victoria, LondonThe
Fight for a Ban in the UK
- J. Dement, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NCThe Chrysotile
Debate
- B. CastlemanThe Global Marketing of Asbestos
Roundtable: 224
Role of Governmental Hygienists in the Next Century
1:00 p.m.4:00 p.m.
Arranger: D. Leong, Ontario Ministry of Labour, Toronto, ON; Moderator:
O. Malik, Ontario Ministry of Labour, Toronto, ON; Monitor: R. Rae,
Ontario Ministry of Labour Mississauga, ON
Governmental hygienists have been leading the way through delivering
comprehensive programs and services. There have been increased awareness
of workplace hazards and progressive development of science in hazard identification,
evaluation, and controls. Enforcement activities have contributed to improving
workplace health and safety. With continuing cutbacks in the government,
and increased emphasis on the programs performance measures and impacts,
how will governmental hygienists continue the leadership role in the next
century? How will the role of governmental hygienists change without changing
their commitment to continue the leadership role? These are some of the
challenges facing governmental hygienists and issues of concern for discussion.
A panel of speakers will address the following issues in each presentation:
(a) Impacts and contributions of government hygienists in the past and present;
(b) Anticipated changes in global environment during the next century; (c)
Impacts of changes on the role of governmental hygienists; and (d) Vision
on the role of governmental hygienists in the next century. The panel will
promote audience discussion and participation as we explore the role of
governmental hygienists in the next century.
- S. Hong, Canadian Centre of Occupational Health and Safety, Hamilton,
ONGovernmental Occupational Hygiene: Assisting the Future Public
Good Role of Government
- M. Corn, Morton Corn and Associates, Queenstown, MDRole of Governmental
Hygienists in the Next Century: Health and Safety Perspective
- B. Goelzer, World Health Organization, GenevaRole of Governmental
Hygienists in the Next Century: Global Perspective
- B. Davies, Australian Environmental Health Serv., Figtree NSWGovernmental
Hygienists in Australia: An Endangered Species
- C. Walker, National Health and Safety Director, Toronto, ONRole
of Governmental Hygienists in the Next Century: Labor Perspective
- M. Connors, Department of Labor, OSHA, Philadelphia, PARole of
Governmental Hygienists in the Next Century: OSHA Perspective
Platform Session 116
Lead
1:00 p.m.3:30 p.m., Papers 121127
Arranger: K. White, Consultive Services, Virginia Beach, VA; Moderator:
K. White, Consultive Services, Virginia Beach, VA; Monitor: E. Botnick,
Free-Col Laboratories, Meadville, PA
- 1:00 p.m. AUTOMATED ABRASIVE BLASTING OF STEEL STRUCTURES: A
REVIEW OF CURRENT TECHNOLOGY. (121) A. Echt, NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH; J.
McGlothlin, DuPont Haskell Laboratory, Newark, DE; K. Dunn, R. Mickelsen,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
- 1:20 p.m. AN ASSESSMENT OF CONTROLS DURING BRIDGE REHABILITATION.
(122) M. Goldberg Hunter College-City University of New York, New York,
NY; N. Clark, N. Zuckerman, Mount Sinai Construction Hygiene and Ergonomics
Program, New York, NY
- 1:40 p.m. CONTRIBUTION OF LEAD PARTICLES IN HOUSE DUST FROM
LEAD MINING WASTE AND LEAD-BASED PAINT AT A SUPERFUND SITE: PART TWO. (123)
D. Sterling, R. Evans, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO; D. Johnson,
State University of New York, Syracuse, NY; M. Bloomfield, Industrial Accident
Prevention Association, Toronto, ON
- 2:00 p.m. EVALUATION OF LEAD-BASED PAINT REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION
TECHNOLOGIES. (124) J. Kominsky, Environmental Quality Management, Inc.,
Cincinnati, OH; P. Clark, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC; V. Hock, A. Edwards-Daniels,
S. Drozdz, U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories. Champaign,
IL
- 2:20 p.m. SETTLING OF LEADED DUST IN INDOOR ENVIRONMENT. (125)
M. Trunov, S. Grinshpun, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; W. Friedman,
K. Choe, HUD Washington, DC; K. Willeke, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,
OH
- 2:40 p.m. DUST FILTRATION CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERATELY PRICED
VACUUM CLEANERS. (126) S. Trakumas, S. Grinshpun, T. Reponen, University
of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; W. Friedman, HUD, Washington, DC; K. Willeke,
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
- 3:00 p.m. ULTRASONIC EXTRACTION AND PORTABLE ANODIC STRIPPING
VOLTAMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF LEAD IN PAINT, DUST, SOIL, AND AIR: AN INTERLABORATORY
EVALUATION. (127) K. Ashley, P. Schlecht, R. Song, C. Esche, NIOSH, Cincinnati,
OH
Platform Session 117
Indoor Air Quality I
1:00 p.m.4:00 p.m., Papers 128136
Arranger: L. Shelby, Reynolds Metals Co., Richmond, VA; Moderator:
L. Shelby, Reynolds Metals Co., Richmond, VA; Monitor: J. Hicks,
Geomatrixs Consulting, Folsom, CA
- 1:00 p.m. INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF GOVERNMENT
FACILITIES: A PROACTIVE STUDY. (128) J. Crawford, J. A. Crawford, Inc.,
Jamesville, NY; I. Shapiro, Taitem Engineering, Ithaca, NY
- 1:20 p.m. DISPERSION OF EXHAUST FROM A ROOFTOP STACK IN AN URBAN
ENVIRONMENT. (129) P. Saathoff, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec;
L. Lazure, Institut de recherche en sante et en securite du travail du
Quebec, Montreal, Quebec; T. Stathopoulos, Concordia University, Montreal,
Quebec
- 1:40 p.m. INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN SIX COMMERCIAL OFFICE
BUILDINGS IN THE MIDWEST UNITED STATES (130) S. Reynolds, P. Subramanian,
G. Breuer, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; M. Stein, Healthy Buildings
International, Fairfax, VA; D. Black, Department of Psychiatry, University
of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; L. Fuortes, P. Whitten, Department of Preventive
Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; L. Burnmeister, P. Thorne,
T. Smith, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
- 2:00 p.m. GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MEASUREMENT OF SICK BUILDING
SYNDROME SYMPTOMS AND PSYCHOSOCIAL PARAMETERS IN LARGE OFFICE BUILDINGS
IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES. (131) M. Stein, Healthy Buildings International,
Fairfax, VA
- 2:20 p.m. EVALUATION OF WORKER EXPOSURES TO VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUND VAPORS IN THREE PHOTOCOPY CENTERS. (132) A. Stefaniak, Johns Hopkins
School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD; P. Breysse, Johns Hopkins
University, Baltimore, MD
- 2:40 p.m. OBSERVATIONS OF PCB EMISSIONS FROM VENTILATION DUCTS
IN AN OFFICE BUILDING. (133) W. Ewing, Compass Environmental, Inc., Marietta,
GA
- 3:00 p.m. EXPOSURE TO PESTICIDES DURING DOMESTIC APPLICATION
TASKS INDOORS. (134) M. Roff, Health Care Systems Consulting, Seattle,
WA
- 3:20 p.m. ROLE OF QUESTIONNAIRES IN INDOOR AIR QUALITY INVESTIGATIONS.
(135) J. Campbell, U. Bickis, Phoenix OHC, Inc., Kingston, ON
- 3:40 p.m. LABORATORY AND FIELD STUDY OF EMISSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
TOBACCO SMOKE FROM SMOKELESS CIGARETTES. (136) R. Rando, H. Poovey, Tulane
School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA; R. Gibson, S. Lehrer, Tulane
Medical School, New Orleans, LA
- 4:00 p.m. INVESTIGATING INDOOR AIR QUALITY IN BUILDINGS WITH
UNIT VENTILATORS. (250) J. Tulis, W. Thomann, Duke University Medical Center,
Durham, NC
Platform Session 118
Respiratory Protection II
1:00 p.m.5:00 p.m., Papers 137146
Arranger: E. Taylor, Health Risk Associates, Dixon, CA; Moderator:
E. Taylor, Health Risk Associates, Dixon, CA; Monitor: E. Gertner,
Industrial Accident Prevention Association, Toronto, ON
- 1:20 p.m. HOW PROTECTIVE ARE RESPIRATOR ASSIGNED PROTECTION
FACTORS? AN UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS. (137) T. Nelson, NIHS, Inc., Ardentown,
DE; M. Jayjock, Rohm and Hass Co., Spring House, PA; C. Colton, Industrial
Accident Prevention Association, Toronto, ON
- 1:40 p.m. SUCCESSFULLY SURVIVING A LABOR ARBITRATION INVOLVING
RESPIRATORS, FACIAL HAIR, AND PAPRs. (138) B. Karas, Owens Corning Toledo,
OH
- 2:00 p.m. LESSONS FROM THE NIOSH FIELD INVESTIGATION PROGRAM
FOR APPROVED RESPIRATORY PROTECTION DEVICES. (139) J. Dower, T. Merinar,
NIOSH, Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, Morgantown, WV
- 2:20 p.m. TODAYS FILTER PARADOX: TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE PROTECTION.
(140) G. Berndtsson, Safety Equipment Australia Pty Ltd Warriewood, New
South Wales, Australia
- 2:40 p.m. PREDICTING WORK PERFORMANCE BASED ON RESPIRATOR COMPONENT
DESIGNS. (141) D. Caretti, U.S. Army Edgewood RD&E Center, Aberdeen
Proving Ground, MD; D. Wourms, Battelle, Columbus, OH
- 3:00 p.m. USE OF A VIRTUAL IMPACTOR TO GENERATE CONCENTRATED
ENVIRONMENTAL AEROSOLS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTING OF SINGLE USE RESPIRATORS.
(142) J. Purdham, A. Sass-Kortsak, P. Bozek, Z. Lukic, B. Urch, University
of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- 3:40 p.m. EFFECT OF EXTERNAL DEAD VOLUME ON PERFORMANCE WHILE
WEARING A RESPIRATOR. (143) A. Johnson, W. Scott, University of Maryland,
College Park, MD
- 4:00 p.m. THERMODYNAMICS OF THE ADSORPTION OF ORGANIC SOLVENT
VAPOR FROM HUMIDIFIED AIR. (144) D. Underhill, University of South Carolina,
Columbia, SC; K. Kawar, Tammer Sciences, Inc., Naperville, IL
- 4:20 p.m. TEMPERATURE PROFILE OF A RESPIRATOR CARTRIDGE FOR
ORGANIC VAPORS DURING ADSORPTION. (145) C. Lungu, University of Minnesota,
Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, Minneapolis, MN
- 4:40 p.m. EFFECTS OF WEARING DIFFERENT TYPES OF RESPIRATORS
ON COMFORT, POSTURAL BALANCE, SKIN TEMPERATURE, AND HEART RATE. (146) F.
Akbar-Khanzadeh, S. Woolley, X. Huang, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo,
OH
Platform Session 119
Toxicology and Occupational Medicine
1:00 p.m.5:00 p.m., Papers 147157
Arrangers: C. Coombs, Steven Winter Associates, Inc., Norwalk, CT;
C. Richard, Achieva, Inc., Baltimore, MD; Moderators: C. Richard,
Achieva, Inc., Baltimore, MD; R. Seguy, Baxter Healthcare Corp., Deerfield,
IL; Monitors: C. Hoffman, Industrial Accident Prevention Association,
Toronto, Ontario; R. Jones, Texas Instruments, Plano, TX
- 1:00 p.m. A SAFE AND PRACTICAL METHOD FOR ASSESSING FUNCTIONAL
CAPACITY. (147) L. Myhre, Alamo Physiological Research Institute, San Antonio,
TX
- 1:20 p.m. EXPOSURE ISSUES IN DETERMINING ENTITLEMENT IN WORKERS
COMPENSATION CASES OF OCCUPATIONAL ASTHMA IN ONTARIO. (148) H. Kabir, Workplace
Safety & Insurance Board, Toronto, ON
- 1:40 p.m. CLEARANCE OF MAN-MADE VITREOUS FIBERS FROM THE LUNGS
OF SHEEP. (149) A. Dufresne, G. Perrault, H. Yamato, S. Masse, R. Begin,
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
- 2:00 p.m. INTEGRATION OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE PRACTICE WITH PREVENTION
OF OCCUPATIONAL INFECTION--EXPERIENCE AT A LARGE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. (150)
E. Aton, V. Fraser, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis,
MO
- 2:20 p.m. AN INVESTIGATION OF COMMUNITY EXPOSURE TO DDT. (151)
L. Wilder, P. Kowalski, L. Campbell, Agency for Toxic Substances &
Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA; T. Rojas, J. Riggan, M. Underwood, California
Department of Health EM, CA
- 2:40 p.m. EXPERIMENTAL MATERIALS FOR ESTABILISHING TLV OXYCARBAME
IN THE AIR OF WORKING ZONE. (152) E. Babayan, R. Hovhanessian, V. Kogan,
M. Sianozova, Institute of General Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, Yerevan,
Amenia
- 3:00 p.m. OSTEOFLUOROSIS IN ALUMINUM FLUORIDE WORKERS IN JORDAN.
(153) B. AbuDhaise, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid,
Jordan; N. Abuomar, Jordan Phosphate Fertilizer Co., Aqaba, Jordan; A.
Batieha, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
- 3:20 p.m. THE TEXARKANA MERCURY INCIDENT. (154) L. Lowry, The
University of Texas Health Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX
- 3:40 p.m. MERCURY EXPOSURE IN A RECYCLING FACILITY. (155) L.
Knobeloch, T. Moen, T. Sieger, Wisconsin Department of Health and Family
Services, Division of Public Health, Madison, WI; J. McCullough, NIOSH,
Cincinnati, OH
- 4:00 p.m. CHROMOSOMAL DISORDERS IN LYMPHOCYTES OF PERIPHERAL
BLOOD OF WORKERS OCCUPIED IN THE HEAVY METALS PRODUCTION. (156) E. Babayan,
S. Baghramian, A. Poghosian, V. Kogan, V. Gabuchian, Institute of General
Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, Yerevan, Amenia; L. Saryan, ACL Industrial
Toxicology Laboratory, West Allis, WI
- 4:20 p.m. BIOCHEMICAL AND HORMONAL DISORDERS IN WORKERS OCCUPATIONALLY
EXPOSED TO MOLYBDENUM DUST AND ITS COMPOUNDS. (157) E. Babayan, V. Kogan,
R. Bumazian, V.Gabuchian, R. Hovhanissian, M. Sianozova, Institute of General
Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, Yerevan, Amenia; L. Saryan, ACL Industrial
Toxicology Laboratory, West Allis, WI
Platform Session 120
Management/Leadership Implementation, Conformity Assessment, and Evaluation
1:00 p.m.4:00 p.m., Papers 158166
Arranger: C. Redinger, Redinger & Associates, San Francisco,
CA; Moderator: D. Dahlstrom, Net Dynamics, Inc., Atlanta, GA; Monitor:
C. Redinger, Redinger & Associates, San Francisco, CA
- 1:00 p.m. WHATS THE RATIONALE FOR IMPLEMENTING AN EHS
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM? (158) G. Brandon, Shaw Industries Ltd., Rexdale, Toronto,
ON
- 1:20 p.m. IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EHS REVIEW/APPROVAL PROCEDURE
FOR NEW EQUIPMENT AND PROCESSES. (159) D. Downs, EHS Management Partners,
Inc., Shorewood, MN
- 1:40 p.m. OSHA REFORM: AN EXAMINATION OF PRIVILEGES FOR THIRD-PARTY
AUDITS. (160) A. Nichting, Patton Boggs, LLP, Denver, CO
- 2:00 p.m. EVALUATION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH PROGRAMS.
(161) D. Pedersen, J. Boiano, NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH
- 2:20 p.m. EVALUATION OF THE SHARED SERVICES MODEL FOR APPLICABILITY
TO SAFETY, HEALTH, AND ENVIROMENTAL STAFF SERVICES AT A GLOBAL CORPORATION.
(162) K. Dotson, BHP Copper, San Francisco, CA; R. MacLean, Competitive
Environment, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ
- 2:40 p.m. A STATUS REPORTING SYSTEM FOR THE ARMY INDUSTRIAL
HYGIENE PROGRAM. (163) S. Monk, USACHPPM APG, MD; J. Evenden, LMI, Bel
Air, MD; R. Litvin, USACHPPM APG, MD
- 3:00 p.m. AN EVALUATION OF HANFORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
VERIFICATION PILOT. (164) C. Briggs, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland,
WA; L. Ramonas, Technical Resources International, Inc., Richland, WA;
W. Westendorf, Link Technologies, Inc., Germantown, MD
- 3:20 p.m. INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE PROGRAMS IN THE DOE COMPLEX: A
COMPOSITE ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT EVALUATIONS CONDUCTED FROM 1995
THROUGH 1998. (165) J. Lockridge, Safety Professionals, Inc., Montmorenci,
SC
- 3:40 p.m. INCENTIVES. (166) R. Stricoff, D. Groover, Behavioral
Science Technology, Inc., Ojai, CA
Case Study: 401
Case Studies I
1:00 p.m.4:00 p.m., Papers 458469
Arranger: L. Freeland, Occupational Health Consultant, Beaumont,
TX; Moderator: R. Wheeler, Industrial Env. Health Cons. Ltd., Morgantown,
WV; Monitor: J. Lambeth, Lambeth Environmental, Raleigh, NC
- 1:00 p.m. ARE ENVIRONMENTAL CABS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
EFFECTIVE FOR PARTICULATES? (458) J. Cocalis, NIOSH, Morgantown, WV
- 1:15 p.m. CALCULATING RADIOFREQUENCY (rF) CONTACT CURRENT. (459)
J. Hollander, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
- 1:30 p.m. COST JUSTIFICATION OF MECHANICAL HANDLING DEVICES.
(460) D. Alexander, Auburn Engineers, Inc., Auburn, AL
- 1:45 p.m. LATERAL PATIENT TRANSFER/AN ERGONOMIC SOLUTION. (461)
K. Wilson Ergodyne, St. Paul, MN
- 2:00 p.m. THE USE OF RAPID UPPER LIMB ASSESSMENT (RULA) AS AN
ERGONOMIC EVALUATION TOOL IN INDUSTRY. (462) R. Williams, Schlumberger
Industries, Tallassee, AL
- 2:15 p.m. BARIUM SULFATE CONTAMINATED WITH NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY
IN A WATER TREATMENT PLANT. (463) I. Drummond, Imperial Oil Limited, Calgary,
Alberta
- 2:30 p.m. SILICOSIS PREVENTION AT NEW YORK CITYS WATER
TUNEL NUMBER THREE. (464) J. Cocalis, NIOSH, Morgantown, WV
- 2:45 p.m. EMERGENCY DRUM REMOVAL ACTION. (465) T. Mustard, Parsons
Engineering Science, Inc., Denver, CO
- 3:00 p.m. POLLUTION PREVENTION WITH GLYCOL DEHYDRATORS. (466)
B. Gantner, Burlington Resources, Inc., Farmington, NM
- 3:15 p.m. QUALITY MANAGEMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL
EPIDEMIOLOGY RESEARCH PROJECTS. (467) G. Young, Arthur D. Little, Inc.,
Cambridge, MA
- 3:30 p.m. TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT OF LARGE IH SURVEYS
CONDUCTED IN SUPPORT OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES. (468) R. Stanevich, NIOSH,
Morgantown, WV
- 3:45 p.m. MODELING ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY WORK PROCESSES:
AN OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE EHS PRODUCTIVITY FROM IMPLEMENTING AN ENTERPRISE-WIDE
SOFTWARE SYSTEM. (469) J. Messelbeck, Allergen, Inc., Irvine, CA
Back to AIHCE Page | Back
to AIHA Home Page
http://www.aiha.org/aihce99/tuesess.hhtml
Lat updated on February 19, 1999 by our webmaster jmyers@aiha.org
Copyright 1999, America Industrial Hygiene
Association
2700 Prosperity Ave., Suite 250, Fairfax, VA 22031
(703) 849-8888; (703) 207-3561 fax