Case Study 10:
Potent Pharmaceutical Compound Containment
Description of Operation
Pharmaceutical manufacturing operations
require the mixing, blending, and processing of multiple
compounds to obtain finished drug products.
Increasingly, new active drug compounds are becoming more potent
thus increasing their toxicity to workers who may be exposed to
the substances during manufacturing. One area
of potentially high exposure to workers is the dispensing of
pharmaceutical ingredients during various stages of the
manufacturing process. Traditionally,
dispensing was performed by carefully hand scooping powders into
containers or directly into process equipment.
Hazard Identification
With the increasing potency of new drug
entities, companies are finding that high levels of personal
protective equipment are required to meet minimum protection
requirements. As drug research has identified
even more potent compounds, respiratory protective equipment
with Assigned Protection Factors (APF) as high as 1000 have been
found to be insufficient to provide adequate employee
protection. In this case the manufacturer
recognized that the use of powered air-purifying respirators
(PAPR) with an APF of 1000, although currently sufficient, would
not effectively protect operators from the new generation of
drug substances being developed. It was
determined that containment technology needed to be developed
that would allow for the accurate measurement and dispensing of
powered drug compounds but that would also protect workers from
potent compound dust exposures.
Hazard Intervention
The company formed a team to determine a
dispensing method that incorporated the necessary parameters to
optimize the combination of manufacturing accuracy, quality
control, cost control, and employee safety and health. The
team determined that using flexible containment glove bag
technology verses fixed containment systems was the most
effective solution to control dust exposures during dispensing
operations.
Impacts of the Intervention
The intervention achieved all of the
necessary requirements of the project. The
glove bag technology lowered the exposure risk by a factor
greater than 1000 with the actual exposure measures being
significantly less than 10% of the established Occupational
Exposure Limit (OEL). As a result of the
intervention there was no longer a need for operators to wear
respiratory protective equipment. Used glove
bags are required to be incinerated after use however the
overall volume of hazardous waste for incineration was reduced
by 75% since the need to dispose of PAPRs was eliminated.
As a result of the intervention operator
confidence in the level of protection being provided is
extremely high.
Financial Metrics
The project resulted in a 5-year net
present value of $27,585 with an internal rate of return of 98%.
The discounted payback period for the project was 0.9 years.
No capital investment was required since the glove bag
equipment was already available at the facility.
The savings in respiratory protective equipment, labor
time to don the RPE, and disposal costs of the RPE more than
offset the planning time associated with the project and the
cost of purchasing and disposal of the glove bags.
The intervention also demonstrated a level
of containment that satisfies the requirements of EU and US
pharmaceutical regulatory agencies with regard to the
cross-contamination of active pharmaceutical ingredients.
The alternative to the solution provided by the
intervention would have required a segregated facility to
dispense compounds. Such a facility would
have cost several millions of dollars in capital expense.
These costs were not considered in the financial metrics
listed above.
Lessons Learned
The project showed containment projects can
result in improvements in employee health exposures and savings
in labor and waste disposal costs. This case
demonstrated an example where containment projects require
little incremental capital investment to accomplish significant
results.
The project not only addressed the current challenge of
employees wearing cumbersome respiratory protective equipment
but also addressed the developing concern about the existing RPE
providing ineffective protection for newer and more potent
pharmaceutical compounds.
|