Case Study 9:
Chemical Containment
Description of Operation
The operation where the intervention
occurred is a process step in the manufacturing of active
pharmaceutical ingredients which are subsequently formulated in
various drug products. The current operation was
an open process involving the repack of resin columns using an
acetonitrile (ACN)
slurry.
Hazard Identification
The current operation involved the addition
of ACN
into an open manway of a process tank. During the operation two
operators were exposed to levels of
ACN ranging from 60-100 parts per million
(PPM). Operators were required to wear
powered air-purifying respiratory protective equipment to
protect against airborne ACN
exposures that were created during the solvent charging process.
Hazard Intervention
To reduce exposure an engineering control
consisting of purchasing and installing a high containment valve
was implemented. By using the high containment
valve for charging the tank, airborne exposures of
ACN
were virtually eliminated.
Impacts of the Intervention
Due to the installation of engineering
controls the airborne levels of ACN were reduced from the 60-100 PPM range to less
than or equal to 1 PPM. The resultant exposure
level eliminated the requirement for operators to wear
respiratory protective equipment (RPE). As a
result there was a cost savings associated with the elimination
of the RPE as well as the associated time required to properly
don/doff the RPE. Prior to the intervention the
process step required three operators, which was subsequently
reduced to two operators after the implementation of the
containment project thus significantly reducing overall labor
costs associated with the operation.
Although no quality deviations had been
previously associated with this manufacturing step the
containment and enclosure of the open process were also
recognized as a quality control improvement. In
addition, containing the process also eliminated foaming issues
sometimes noted during the operation of the process, but the
benefit of the reduction has yet to be fully evaluated.
The process change also reduced by one
third the amount of ACN
lost to the environment during the operation thus allowing a
small material savings and a corresponding lowering of volatile
organic compound (VOC) air emissions. The enclosed
process would require additional Leak Detection and Repair
(LDAR) monitoring points to be added to the environmental
monitoring schedule, but the incremental cost was minimal.
Another benefit of the project was the
elimination of the need to dispose of used RPE as hazardous
waste. As a result one drum of hazardous waste per month and the
associated disposal costs were eliminated.
Financial Metrics
The financial metrics associated with the
intervention indicated that the project yielded a 5-year net
present value (NPV) of $23,629 with an internal rate of return
of 14%. The project had a discounted payback period of 3.8
years. Therefore in addition to the benefits of
lower employee ACN
exposures, improved quality, reduced air emissions and reduced
hazardous waste the project also yielded a competitive rate of
the return on the organization’s investment. The project also
resulted in some improvement in employee morale due to
eliminating the need for the wearing of respiratory protective
equipment.
Lessons Learned
The benefits of making IH-related process improvements
that many times are designed to reduce or eliminate employee
health exposures can also result in significant business
improvements or savings. In this case the implementation of
engineering controls resulted in a process change that reduced
labor and material costs, improved product quality, reduced air
emissions, and reduced the volume of hazardous waste generated
and its associated disposal cost and liability.
|