Figures and Tables

figures

Figure E-1. ROHSEI Gross Cost Savings Equation
Figure E-2. Expanded ROHSEI Framework
Figure I-1. Project Matrix for Quantitative Analysis
Figure I-2. Range of Employee Populations of Responding Companies
Figure I-3. Number of Employees by Functional Area
Figure I-4. Total Number of Manufacturing/Operations Employees per Industry Sector
Figure I-5. Distribution of Survey Participants by Total Number of Manufacturing/Operations Employees
Figure I-6. Total IH Program Time Spent on Risk
Figure I-7. Percentage of Total Program Time Spent on Specific Risk Assessment Activities
Figure I-8. Percentage of Total Program Time Spent on Specific Risk Control Activities
Figure I-9. Companies with Comprehensive Industrial Hygiene Exposure Monitoring Strategies with Health Monitoring System Capabilities
Figure I-10. Companies Conducting Health Studies Using the Health Monitoring System
Figure I-11. Availability of Data at the Best IH Site Level
Figure I-12. Availability of Data at the Corporate Level
Figure I-13. Cost-Related Outcome Data for Best IH Program Sites
Figure I-14. Cost-Related Outcome Data at the Corporate Level
Figure I-15. Health- and Exposure-related Outcome Data for Best IH Sites
Figure I-16. Health- and Exposure-related Outcome Data at the Corporate Level
Figure I-17. Human Resources Outcome Data and Costs for Best IH Sites
Figure I-18. Human Resources Outcome Data and Costs, Including Business and Financial Metrics, at Best IH Program Sites
Figure I-19. Human Resources Outcome Data and Costs at the Corporate Level
Figure I-20. Human Resources Outcome Data and Costs, Including Business and Financial Metrics, at the Corporate Level
Figure I-21. Legal Metrics and Costs Data at Best IH Sites
Figure I-22. Legal Metrics and Costs Data at the Corporate Level
Figure I-23. Business Case Analysis for IH Projects and/or Programs
Figure I-24. Business Case Presented to Management
Figure I-25. Business Case: Level of Managemen
Figure I-26. Interest in Further Participation
Figure II-1. New Framework for Cost-based Valuation
Figure II-2. A Strategy Overview: Annualized Net Cost of Interventions for Preventing Occupational Low Back Pain (LBP)
Figure II-3. The ROHSEI Process and Tools
Figure II-4. Four Strategies for Determining Return on Investment (ROI)
Figure II-5. First Level of Analysis Example
Figure II-6. Causal Loop Diagram Example
Figure II-7. Causal Loop Diagrams from ROHSEI Documentation
Figure II-8. Sample Case Study
Figure III-1. Cause and Effect (Fishbone) Diagram
Figure III-2. Key Business Objectives Framework
Figure III-3. The Qualitative Approach
Figure III-4. Training Program Outline
Figure IV-1. IH Value Equation
Figure IV-2. Outline of Phase IV Approach
Figure IV-3: Quantitative Strategy Matrix – Projects
Figure IV-4. The Quantitative Approach
Figure IV-5. Summary of Financial Analysis of Case Studies,by Hierarchy Level
Figure V-1. The Business Objectives Strategy
Figure V-2. The Overarching IH Value Strategy
Figure V-3. The Qualitative Approach of the IH Value Strategy
Figure V-4. The Quantitative Approach of the IH Value Strategy
Figure V-5. Value Equation
Figure VI-1. Relationships Between Survey Responses for Predictor Questions and Business Results Questions
Figure VI-2. Relationships Between Survey Responses for Predictor Questions and Business Results Questions (cont’d)
Figure VI-3. Illustration of Survey Relationships
Figure VI-4. Relationships of Proportion of Yes Responses of Business Results Questions to Proportion of Yes Responses to from Predictors
Figure VI-5. Business Results (BR) as a function of Leadership (L)
Figure VI-6. Business Results (BR) as a function of Strategic Planning (SP)
Figure VI-7. Business Results (BR) as a function of Customer Focus (CF)
Figure VI-8. Business Results (BR) as a function of Workforce Focus (W)
Figure VI-9. Business Results (BR) as a function of Process Management (PM)

Tables

Table I-1. Use of Recognized Management Systems and/or Processes
Table I-2. Number of Companies with IH Program Cost or Improvement Studies
Table I-3. Cost or Improvement Studies on IH Risk Assessment and Control Programs
Table I-4. Cost or Improvement Studies in Specific Risk Control Areas
Table I-5. IH Program Goals
Table I-6. Specific Capabilities of Companies that Conduct Health Studies
Table II-1. Example Cash Flow Statement Associated with a “Status Quo” Scenario
Table II-2. Example Cash Flow Statement Associated with a “Proposed Option” Scenario
Table II-3. Net Present Value Calculation
Table II-4. Sample Payback Period Calculation
Table II-5. Comparison of IRR and NPV as Merit Measures in a Large Cash Outlflow Scenario
Table II-6. Assessing Proposed Options with Net Cash Flow Measures
Table II-7. Assessing Proposed Options with Cumulative Cash Flow Measures
Table II-8. The Four Parts of the Productivity Assessment Tool
Table II-9. The Productivity Assessment Tool: Potential Interventions for Reduced Productivity
Table II-10. The Six Steps of the CERSSO Strategy
Table II-11. Method for Calculating Prevention Effort Costs
Table II-12. The Alignment of ROHSEI Processes and Tools
Table II-13. Literature Review Results: Monetary Consequences and Costs of S&H Interventions.
Table II-14. Literature Review Results: Details of Analyses, Outcomes, and Results of Intervention Effectiveness Studies
Table II-15. Metrics for Determining Effectiveness of Health-related Lost Time Programs
Table II-16. Potential Changes Resulting from IH Work
Table II-17. Potential Business Impacts Resulting from IH Work
Table II-18. IH Value Strategy Impact Elements
Table II-19. AIHA Value of the Profession Data Element Analysis Matrix
Table VI-1. Survey Questions Labeling Scheme
Table VI-2. P-Values from Hypothesis Test of Equal Portion of Yes Responses
Table E-1. AIHA Value of the Profession Data Element Analysis Matrix